翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Meads, Kentucky ・ Meadvale ・ Meadview, Arizona ・ Meadville ・ Meadville (album) ・ Meadville Area Senior High School ・ Meadville Corporation ・ Meadville Downtown Historic District ・ Meadville Lombard Theological School ・ Meadville Medical Center Foundation ・ Meadville, Mississippi ・ Meadville, Missouri ・ Meadville, Nebraska ・ Meadville, Pennsylvania ・ MeadWestvaco ・ MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue ・ MEAF6 ・ Meaford ・ Meaford Formation ・ Meaford Hall, Staffordshire ・ Meaford Power Station ・ Meaford, Ontario ・ Meaford, Staffordshire ・ Meagan Duhamel ・ Meagan Fuller ・ Meagan Good ・ Meagan Holder ・ Meagan McCray ・ Meagan McKinney ・ Meagan Miller Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue ： ウィキペディア英語版 MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue ''MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue'', 553 U.S. 16 (2008) is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the extent a state may tax companies that are not based in their state. Mead, a corporation based out of Ohio, owned Lexis-Nexis, which was based out of Illinois. Mead sold Lexis, and Illinois maintained that Mead must pay them a proportionate capital-gains tax. Illinois asserted that Mead and Lexis were integrated to the extent required for the "unitary business rule". This rule allowed states to tax a proportionate share of the value generated by an interstate corporation. The Supreme Court held that the two businesses were not integrated enough to be considered a "unitary business" and Illinois was not allowed to tax Mead on the Lexis sale. ==External links== *(Full decision ) 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.